Just the other day I was wondering how books fared during the Great Depression, in terms of the kind of books being written and their sales. Our Florida correspondent, aka Michael Haskins, sends us Tom Engelhardt’s answer, which comes via the Los Angeles Times. Warning: if you’re a writer, this piece might well ruin your Christmas. To wit: As for the third factor fostering the illusion of prosperity, it was well known in the business that, during the Depression, books, like movies, had done splendidly. They were an inexpensive distraction, consumable at home at a time when not much else pleasurable was going on. Ergo, books would be no less recession-proof in the next big downturn.All of which is pretty gloomy, it has to be said. But here’s the thing: for writers like me, by which I mean someone who isn’t making enough money out of writing to justify doing it, nothing has changed. I’ll keep writing anyway, hoping someone will pick up my next book, and the next book after that. Besides, what else would I be doing with those three spare minutes a day?
There was no reason to believe otherwise ... unless you happened to focus on just how many dazzling entertainment options had, in the interim, entered the American home at prices more than competitive with the book. After all, most Americans can now read endlessly on the Internet, play video games, download music, watch movies and even write their own novels without stepping outside. The $27.95 hardcover and the $15.95 paperback, meanwhile, are hardly inexpensive. Publishers nonetheless clung to this bit of Depression-era lore for dear life as economic bad times bore down. Wrongly, as it turned out …
The book remains a techno-wonder that not even the Kindle has surpassed. But it’s a wonder in a very crowded entertainment universe and a world plunging into the worst of times. The chain bookstore, the bloated publishing house and the specific corporate way of publishing that goes with them are indeed in peril. This may no longer be their time. As for the time of the book, it does seem to be shortening as well.
Meanwhile, publishers can’t afford not to support their big sellers, and they can also afford to take relatively cheap punts on the bottom-feeders, hoping that one or two of them will pay off. Which means that it’s probably the mid-listers who are going to get squeezed over the next couple of years. Or am I being excessively pessimistic?
As much as I hate to admit it, I share your pessimism. I've pretty much written off 2009 as the year it won't happen for me (at any level). But in a way, I feel better for it. Like I'm under less pressure. Anybody asks me if I've sold Piranhas yet and I can blame it on the credit crunch/recession. In the meantime I'll just merrily blog away, write as much as I can and see what happens. And you know, there's still a little optimism there. 2010, 2011... who knows what's going to happen?
ReplyDeletegb
Okay, I'm going to get all Pollyanna on your ass here, buds.
ReplyDeleteThose of us who are still reading books clearly can't stop. So much energy, technology, competition for our time, etc., etc., has been thrown at us these past hundred years and still we continue to read books.
Hell, Nintendo is bringing out books for the DS game system.
If books were going to stop being read it would have happened years ago - TV would have killed them, the movies would have, video games would've, the internet...
I doubt more than a tiny percentage of the population have ever been avid book readers and I doubt that percentage is likely to change much - one way or the other. But we're stubborn and we replace our lost commrades with just enough new recruits to keep us going.
Yes, 2009 will be a tough year to get started making money - the whole thing is in flux and we don't know how it's going to shake out - but it'll be a fine time to write. There's plenty of material.
And it's now possible to get that writing out there and meet people. I met you guys this year and that never would have happened thirty years ago when I started at this (don't use me as an example, not many people sell a short story in 1985 and then nothing till 2004 - but I will say if I had been able to get stuff in webzines and the like, I would have instead of just getting the constant stream of rejections from print publications I did get).
It's not all bad. It's hard. We're hard (well, okay, not really, but we can write hard).
Dec
ReplyDeleteI really think you're onto something. Its a big effort to buy and read a book, so why not just skip it esp when it costs a fortune. I got a a trade paperback of the new Paul Theroux yesterday. It cost 40 dollars here in Australia! 40 bucks for a trade pbk! If it hadnt been for a Christmas present I would never have spent that in a million years.
Adrian, have a look at the Sony e-reader. It's still too expensive, but there's a lot of potential. The e-ink screen is nothing like a computer screen, it really reads like a book.
ReplyDeleteIf I had an e-reader now, I could go here and pick up Dead I Well May Be for six bucks (The Bloomsday Dead is still almost sixteen bucks, but wirth it).
I don't know, folks. It probably won't be quite as bad as we expect it to be, but it'll be nowhere as good as we hope. Business as usual, then ...
ReplyDeleteCheers, Dec
Ger
ReplyDeleteMore like twenty friggin quid. Ridiculous.
John
Hmmmm, very very interesting. I will look into that. But here's my big question. Dare you take it into the bath?
Yeah, business as usual, Dec, business as usual.
ReplyDeleteAdrian, this is Canada, we take quick showers and get our parkas and mukluks and togues back on as fast as we can...
Oh sigh. I worry about stuff like this regularly.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, doom and gloom be damned, have a lovely Christmas Declan, and indeed everyone.
Arlene
You know the odd thing is that after I posted that I went downtown for my usual "I'm not cooking so what is there in the way of prepared food?" quest, and as I was walking past Long's, there was a little beep-beep and there he was in his car just being friendly. He doesn't live here most of the year, just occasionally. I'm saying this mostly because after the whole Oprah kefuffle, he got sort of a bad rap, when actually he is a very nice guy. We're just friendly through mutual friends, but before I ever met him, I defended him as his sole representative about declining the Oprah appearance at one particularly heated Thanksgiving meal, so I feel I have somewhat earned the friendship.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I think he's a fantastic writer. And actually, he went through, and I think actually still goes through, his share of writerly angst about the future of novels. Once upon a time, he wrote a great rant about the writing life for the Atlantic which I think is collected in his essay collection How to Be Alone. That was the first I ever heard of him.
Seanag
ReplyDeleteI only know him through The Corrections. The stuff on the cruise ship - friggin hilarious. The cooking stuff was good too, and yes the erotica wasnt bad either. I'll check out those essays.